ASCI Influencer Disclosure
The requirement that an influencer clearly label any post carrying a material connection to a brand, using a plain disclosure visible before the audience has to tap or scroll.
The Advertising Standards Council of India issued its guidelines for influencer advertising in digital media in 2021. The principle behind them is simple and old: an advertisement should be recognisable as an advertisement. What the guidelines add is a practical standard for creator content, where the line between a recommendation and a paid placement is invisible to the audience unless someone draws it.
What triggers the requirement
The trigger is a material connection between the creator and the brand — and it is much broader than most brands assume. Money is only the obvious case. A material connection also exists where the creator received free products, a discount, a trip or hotel stay, or event access, and equally where there is a family, employment or equity relationship. None of that has to be a formal contract.
If a connection exists, the post is advertising, and it must say so — whether or not the brand asked for a particular message, and whether or not the creator genuinely likes the product.
What a compliant disclosure looks like
- Plain wording. Terms such as advertisement, ad, sponsored, collaboration or partnership are understood. Invented shorthand and coded language are not.
- Upfront. It must be visible without the audience taking any action. A disclosure below the "more" cut on a caption fails, because most people never expand it.
- Prominent. Not buried at the end of a block of thirty hashtags, not in a colour that disappears into the background, not in text too small to read on a phone.
- Present in the medium being consumed. On a video, a caption-only disclosure is not enough — it needs to be superimposed and held long enough to be read. On a live stream it needs repeating, because viewers join partway through.
- On the post itself. A line in the creator's bio does not disclose anything about an individual post.
Why brands should care, not just creators
It is tempting to treat this as the influencer's problem. It is not. ASCI is a self-regulatory body, but influencer marketing in India also sits under consumer protection law, where the Central Consumer Protection Authority has statutory powers over misleading advertisements and endorsements and can act against the advertiser as well as the endorser. The reputational exposure lands on the brand regardless of who filed the post, and platforms increasingly enforce their own branded-content disclosure rules on top.
The practical answer is to make disclosure a briefing requirement rather than a request: specify the exact label, specify where it must appear, and check the live post rather than the draft.
Worked example
A skincare brand sends a creator a hamper worth a few thousand rupees with no fee and no script. The creator likes it and posts a genuine review.
That is still advertising. The free product is a material connection, so the post needs a disclosure — even though nobody was paid and nobody was told what to say.
A compliant Instagram Reel would open its caption with #Ad as the first
visible element rather than after a hashtag block, and carry a superimposed
"Sponsored" label on-screen for long enough to be read at normal playback, rather
than as a one-frame flash.
Common mistakes
- Assuming gifting is exempt. Free product is a material connection. No invoice does not mean no advertisement.
- Putting the disclosure in the bio instead of on each post.
- Hiding it after the fold. A label below the "more" link is not upfront, which is the whole requirement.
- Caption-only disclosure on video. Someone watching without reading the caption never sees it.
- Coded or invented tags the audience is not expected to understand.
- Signing off the draft and never checking the live post. Disclosure is most often lost in the final edit.
Need this handled properly? See how we run it →